One thing that sets it apart from those other malts is it's neither artificially colored nor chillfiltered. I'm not sure how many low-priced official single malts can claim the same presentation.
I had never tried the anCnoc 12 until (*DISCLOSURE*) Amy from Ten27 Communications sent me a free bottle last year (thank you, Amy). But I did have on hand a European bottling sample I'd purchased from Master of Malt at the very beginning of 2013. Here are the differences between the two:
2016 US Edition - 43%abv, not artificially colored, not chillfiltered
~2012 EUR Edition - 40%abv, colored and chillfiltered
I compared three pours: the 43%, the 43% reduced to 40%, and the 40%...
Grayscale was utilized because my color photo was crap |
Owner: Inver House Distillers (via Thai Beverages plc via International Beverage Holdings Ltd.)
Type: Single Malt
Region: border of Speyside and Western Highlands
Type: Single Malt
Region: border of Speyside and Western Highlands
Age: minimum 12 years
Maturation: mostly American oak ex-bourbon barrels, and a little bit of Spanish oak ex-sherry casks
Bottling year: 2016 for the US and (circa) 2012 for the EUR
Alcohol by Volume: 43% for US, 40% for EUR
Maturation: mostly American oak ex-bourbon barrels, and a little bit of Spanish oak ex-sherry casks
Bottling year: 2016 for the US and (circa) 2012 for the EUR
Alcohol by Volume: 43% for US, 40% for EUR
Chill-filtration? No for the US, Yes for the EUR
Caramel colored? No for the US, Yes for the EUR
Review pour of US edition was taken from top third of the bottle.
Caramel colored? No for the US, Yes for the EUR
Review pour of US edition was taken from top third of the bottle.
anCnoc 12 year old, 2016 US Edition, 43%abv
Nose - Citronella, honey and Sugar Daddy candy make up the foreground. A considerable nutty Parmesan-Reggiano note lingers throughout. Fresh pears and apples in the background.
Palate - Fruitier than the nose, lots of plums and nectarines. Has a bolder bite and delivery than Glens Fiddich and Livet. With time, it picks up a slight floral thing, then lots of lime and fizziness.
Finish - A little floral, a little toffee, a little ash. Lots of lemon, grapefruit and ginger ale.
* * * * *
anCnoc 12 year old, 2016 US Edition, reduced to 40%abv
Nose - Still with the parmesan. Fruit is pushed further back, but caramel candy comes forward. A little chalky. The citronella slowly comes back together, T1000-style.
Palate - A zesty herbal bitterness arrives quickly. Pretty malty overall. A nice creamy citrus note, too.
Finish - Malty and sweeter, but shorter.
* * * * *
anCnoc 12 year old, 2012 Europe Edition, 40%abv
Nose - Lots of caramel candy upfront. Milk chocolate. Kinda like Milk Duds, I think. With plaster. It gets peachier with time, then some malt and salt show up.
Palate - Thinner texture than the US version, but it has the same fizziness. And, curiously, more heat. Quicker, tarter fruit. Caramel candy. And LOTS of bitter hoppy IPA.
Finish - An IPA with more heat. So much grapefruit and hops. Hints of dried grass and milk chocolate.
WORDS WORDS WORDS
Compared to the aforementioned decently-priced 12 year old single malts, I'd put this slightly ahead of Glenfiddich 12 and Tomatin 12, and waaaaaaaay ahead of Glenlivet 12. While it's a casual drinker, anCnoc 12 does have some nice crisp fruit and a good challenging edge to it. Old Pulteney 12, while being a much different whisky, has bold lines and noticeable unique (distillery?) traits as the anCnoc 12 does. So they'd rank somewhere around the same level, in my opinion. Neither whisky will move you, emotionally, but each deliver a little something above average.
Now that references the US edition only. The 2012 European edition is okay, a totally acceptable whisky, but more than that. I don't know its difference is due to dilution or filtering or coloring. The edgy IPA character keeps it from falling into the 70s grade-wise.
The US edition still wins out when it's diluted to 40%abv, and feels like it could take a little more water too. I might experiment with that further. If anything new is discovered, I'll provide updates in the comment section.
Overall, anCnoc's 18yo is a superior whisky, but if you're in the US and can find this 12yo for less than $40, it's a reasonable drink for the dollar.
2016 US edition
Availability - US only
Pricing - $35-$60, average in the mid- to high-40s
Rating - 84
~2012 Europe edition
Availability - Europe only
Pricing - $30-$50, average in the mid-30s
Rating - 80
AnCnoc 12 and Old Pulteney 12 have both jumped over Glenmorangie Original for my starter whisky recs. Like you say, they're not going to blow anyone away, but they're extremely solid values.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I think, people who like AnCnoc 12 and Old Pulteney 12 right from the start will have good luck when moving to crazier whiskies. Those two whiskies aren't featureless single malts.
DeleteIf Benromach 10 were $10 to $20 cheaper a bottle (it's presently $49.99 where I am), I might consider making it my regular house single malt. It's still a whisky that might be a bit challenging to beginners though.
DeleteThe arran 10 is in this range also non chill and natural color.
ReplyDeleteI just notice a 43% ABv acnoc 12 was missing the non chill, nat. color statement missing on bottle in new Hampshire liquor store?
ReplyDeleteWhat's going on?
Hi speedrakk. Thanks for your observation. I just did some snooping and found out that around 2017 the Natural Color and Non Chillfiltered statements started disappearing from bottles. It's fair to suspect that the whisky is now being colored and chillfiltered. The ownership hasn't changed, so I wonder why they made that decision.
DeleteGlen garioch 12 and craigallachie 13 here I come.
ReplyDelete