Tuesday: The Diageo whisky brands
Wednesday: A summary of my larger Diageo conflicts
I used to write whisky industry-related posts almost once a week. But then I stopped. Writing about corporate actions and rising prices made me angry. But writing about actual whisky made me happy. So I focused on my single malt reports instead.
Each time I've found something enjoyable to obsess about -- baseball, music, movies, whisky -- I get to the point where I discover how business and finance shapes or limits those pleasures. Then the fun drains out. So here I am, left index finger in a splint, typing very slowly (a total martyr, right?!), brain running very quickly, writing about how the business is ruining my joy. I'm already grumpy (I mean, you try washing your right arm with your right hand), so maybe this was the perfect week for Done With Diageo.
For this week's series, I wanted to air out my issues with Diageo in one place rather than gripe and snark about them here and there. I also wanted folks to think about what they drink before they drink it. But don't think too much while you're drinking. Seriously, or not so seriously, I don't want to ruin people's enjoyment of everything. I'm also not a complete communist. Not all businesses are bad. Just most of them. ;-)
I don't take back anything I've written this week, though I may have overstated my pricing issue. As of today, the regular "Classic Malts" are priced well and if you have the coin to buy 25yo single malt then Diageo's are comparable to the rest of the market. Because I do agree with many of the counterpoints presented this week, I'll clarify where I stand.
To begin with, I'm in the camp that thinks when it comes to whisky prices, we are in the new market reality. Yes, whisky is getting more expensive at a rate that far exceeds discretionary income growth. When those price increases are no longer tenable, then assets will be liquidated, overhead will be reduced, and prices may plateau. But they will not go down. For those of you in my boat who wish prices would go back to where they were even three years ago, get used to disappointment.
And it's not just Diageo and LVMH at fault here. Beam, William Grant, Edrington, Inver House, Suntory, Burn Stewart, and Pernod Ricard are all actively raising prices -- mostly because they know we will continue to pay them. The independents will raise their own as well, especially as they get fewer and fewer casks to sell.
The auctions are at fault as well, from the fools (the politest term I can manage) who are grossly overpaying for items, to the houses themselves (like Bonhams and McTears) providing misleading information and selling easily identifiable fakes. As the secondary market prices go up, so will the primary market's prices.
How about my gripe about dwindling indie casks? Diageo is far from alone on that one. Glenfiddich has let maybe a handful of casks go since I've been born. Balvenie and Glenfarclas indies are either teaspooned or have to go by another name. Meanwhile non-OB Macallans are getting rarer. The Big D isn't the only one hoarding malt. This was also demonstrated when most of the major owners pulled their own vatted malts from the market at the same time Johnnie Walker did so.
And my qualm with Diageo barely bottling any of their distilleries' single malts? Pernod releases single malts from less than half of their distilleries. Bacardi doesn't release any [Correction! They do regularly release a 12yo and 21yo from Aberfeldy. Thanks, Eric!].
But just because everyone else is guilty of some of the issues, doesn't mean that Diageo is in the right. In fact with their size and influence, their choices carry much more power.
I also don't care what the reasoning was behind Diageo killing off Green Label. It was a brand I liked, and they took it away, so it's a personal frustration. Their pricing on Talisker 18 essentially killed off another of my favorite whiskies. Another personal frustration. And I don't take back anything I said about the goofy Diageo PR machine. Nor how I feel about the crappy presentation of what is some of the most glorious whisky in the world, before it is tampered with. Nor will I stop questioning how Scottish their Scotch actually is. Nor am I comfortable with a single international conglomerate controlling such a considerable part of the liquid. Nor do I forgive them for some very ugly corporate actions.
But is it enough for a boycott?
Well, I'm 97% there already. I've purchased one Diageo product all year. (I had to get that Talisker 10, didn't I!) In the bigger picture, I'm making an conscious effort to slow (or stop) my whisky buying in general because: 1.) prices are higher; 2.) I have less discretionary income than I used to; and 3.) my whisky cabinet is almost packed tight.
One of my biggest frustrations about the whisky community is that no one (aside from Mr. Scotch and Ice Cream, Tim Read) seems to be satisfied with that what he already has. And by "satisfied" I do not mean the obsessive narcissistic posting of bottle pics on the Malt Maniacs and Friends Facebook page. The drive is to buy more, more, more or (worse) buy/flip, buy/flip, buy/flip. Because retail therapy can turn into an addiction, and because the real pleasure of whisky is in the drinking and sharing -- not the hoarding -- I'm trying very hard to learn how to be happy with what I've got. It's not easy, and I fail often, but I'm going to keep focusing on that pursuit.
With all of that in mind and with a reduced whisky budget, I need to be selective about my purchases. And the question goes back to, who do I want to support? Not Diageo, directly.
I will continue to support small malt producers. Distilleries like Arran and Kilchoman must bring a great product to the market in order to survive, then keep it great in order to stay open. Having grown up with small businesses in my family, I want to support the little guys because I know how difficult it is to turn a profit when resources are small and how much the human aspect is needed in order to succeed.
Many of my purchases will be from independent bottlers. And if one of those bottlers get its hands on a Diageo cask, then I may just avail myself of one of those bottles. Since Diageo malt and grain whiskies are inside almost every single blend out there, I will continue to buy (tasty) blends. There's no way I would stop supporting Compass Box; Glaser è il maestro.
With Diageo owning 34% of their drinks segment, there's a real dearth of LVMH whisky I desire to buy, especially with Glenmorangie putting the kibosh on Astar. I've never found an officially bottled United Spirits (now owned by Diageo) malt that made me yearn for a second sip. But I'm in trouble if Diageo ever does buy Beam Inc.
For the time being, you will find more Diageo single malt reports here because I have a bunch of goodies in the stash. After those goodies are gone, I'll have to consider how I'll treat samples. Inside my brain, arguments rage about both sides.
I worry that this week's series came across holier-than-thou. I don't want to be the guy standing in front of the store, holding the sign that says "EVERY TIME YOU SHOP AT WALMART, GOD KILLS A KITTEN", because we all know that God only kills a kitten every time you masturbate.
|Not the reason behind my hand injury|
What was my point?
Thank you for your comments, tweets, and facebookages. I actually agree with most of your challenges, and they all made me think about what I wrote. And my intent wasn't to be a bummer, so I'm sorry if I pissed in your whisky. Industry leaders piss in my whisky all the time. Diageo, with their big D, is the preeminent perpetual pissing perpetrator, and I'm tired of it. So, I won't give them my money.
Next week, I'll go back to reporting on the fun stuff.