...where distraction is the main attraction.

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Clynelish 18 year old 1997 Hepburn's Choice for K&L

I'm rolling out the 1997 Clynelish for Xmas. I don't think I've reviewed this undeservedly(?) famous(?) vintage(?) since July 2013.

For those of you who are wondering what I'm talking about, a subset of whisky enthusiasts believe that 1997 Clynelishes are consistently fabulous. Another subset think that's a bunch of rubbish. If one is going by facts (and why would one want to do that?), there's an unusually large quantity of single cask Clynelish that had been distilled in 1997 (300+ 1997 releases versus 70+ 1998 releases and 30+ 1999 releases, for instance). In fact, there are more 1997 Clynelish on the market than any other "vintage" from that distillery. So there's a lot of it, whether or not it's always great.

I've found some 1997 Clynelish to be very good and others that aren't. Profound, innit?

Distillery: Clynelish
Ownership: Diageo
Region: Northern Highlands
Independent Bottler: Hunter Laing
Label: Hepburn's Choice
Exclusive to: K&L Wine Merchants
Age: 18 years (1997-2015)
Maturation: refill hogshead
Bottles: 254
Alcohol by Volume: 55.4%
Chillfiltered? No
Caramel Colorant? No
(Thanks to Brett for the sample!)

NEAT
The nose has a nice array of characteristics. Citronella, orange peel, melted candles, honeydew, whole wheat bread and honey. It has a darker side with chalk dust and industrial grease. The palate is hot and very very tangy. Stones and peppercorns. Pears and honey. A slight vanilla creaminess. It finishes salty, tangy and sweet.

DILUTED to ~46%abv, or 1¼ tsp of water per 30mL whisky
The nose is cleaner and fruitier. Lemons, orange and maybe something tropical. The palate remains almost palate-strippingly tangy. Salt, pepper, flowers and simple sweet barley note. The finish has been clipped short. Tangy and peppery.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
I sampled this whisky along with yesterday's 18yo SMWS Caol Ila, and this Clynelish got trounced. It's a noser, not a drinker. The nose is great, with or without dilution, being both friendly and complex. I wouldn't say the palate is DOA, it's just flat and bland aside from the violent tangy note. It doesn't require more dilution because there was almost no finish left at 46%abv.

Another instance of a B range nose and a C range palate. I'm unimpressed with the Clynelish this month. Gonna have to haul out the big guns on Thursday and Friday, but tomorrow will bring a 20yo Caol Ila.

Availability - Sold out
Pricing - $99.99
Rating - 81

Monday, December 24, 2018

Caol Ila 18 year old 1995 SMWS 53.197


And it's off to the races to get to Whisky 2000! There will be five whisky reviews this week. And I'm back on the Clynelish - Caol Ila Train. As mentioned earlier this month, the reviews are going from youngest to oldest. Now we're up to the 18 year olds. One Caol Ila today, one Clynelish tomorrow. Both from refill hoggies.

Historically, I've found more misses than hits among the SMWS releases I've tried. That club's membership and prices remain remain a quandary to me, but they appear to be doing just fine without me and my money. In any case, it's difficult to screw up a well-aged Caol Ila, so lemme see...

A unicorn?
Distillery: Caol Ila
Owner: Diageo
Region: Islay
Independent bottler: Scotch Malt Whisky Society
"Funny" name: A stoker in drag
Age: 18 years (24 August 1995 to 2014). That's a good birthday.
Maturation: Refill hogshead
Cask number: 53.197
Outturn: 253
Alcohol by Volume: 57.4%
(thanks to Brett P for the sample!)

NEAT
Oh man, scrumptious peat on the nose, like peated pecan pie. Then pineapple juice and milk chocolate. Hints of iodine, lemon and smoked salmon. Mango, limes and BBQ-ish peat start off the palate. Then honey, baklava and almond cookies. The smoke gradually intensifies with time. The ABV reads like it's 10 points lower than it actually is. It finishes with salty smoked meats, a dry wood smoke, moss and limes.

DILUTED TO ~46%abv, or 1½ tsp of water per 30mL whisky
Charred meat, smoked fish, soil, cloves and lemon candy on the nose. Wood smoke, Thai chiles and brown sugar on the palate, followed by smoked fish and a creamy mango pudding. The finish is a little sweeter than the palate and has a gentler smoke note. A little bit of the mango too.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
An excellent whisky that reminds one not to weep for the loss of Port Ellen, this Caol Ila may be the best Scotch Malt Whisky Society bottling I've had. They bottled it at just the right time; excellent maturation without any oak interruption. The fruit, salt, smoke and savory elements are dynamite together. Yum. If you've got this, open this, drink this, especially in winter. Whisky 1001 is a success!

Availability - Sold out
Pricing - ???
Rating - 91

Friday, December 21, 2018

Whisky 1000: Old Hermitage Reserve Rye, bottled early 1910s

Five years ago, I was introduced to someone as "the guy who's tried more than 200 whiskies." The gentleman with whom I was being acquainted responded with a skeptical, "How'd you do that?" With the moment catching me by surprise, my answer was, "I don't really know."

But I do know. I could have only done this because of you. Thank you. Thank you for checking in on my last latest rants, complaints, brilliant ideas, loves and general narcissism. A story doesn't exist without an audience. Something brought you here and keeps you here, and I'll do everything I can to inspire you to stick around for more. Thanks again for stopping by.

I'd also like to thank the following people for supplying the drugs: Aaron, Amy, Andrew S, Andy S, Brett, Chris, Cobo, Eric S, Florin, Jennifer, Joe, John, Jordan, Josh F, Josh H, Josh P, Josh S, Lee, Linda, Linh, M.A.O., Matt W, Michael R, Ryan O, Ryan S, Ryan S, Sjoerd, Sku, Teemu, Tetris, Tim and Vik. (There are others, I know, and I'm so sorry for missing your name here. Thank you too!) I'd also like to thank LASC, OCSC, SCWC and CSN for deepening the exploration and also making humans hang out with each other.



And then there was 1000.

Four Decembers back, I spent a whisky evening with one Joshua Feldman, known to many as The Coopered Tot. Josh had always been very generous with his collection and knowledge, but on this night...holy moley...he announced we would be opening this:


Bottled by W. Bixby & Company in the early 1910s, this rye was distilled by W.A. Gaines & Co (one of the largest whiskey producers at the time) at The Hermitage Distillery in Frankfort, Kentucky. E.H. Taylor Jr was one of the company's early financiers, but he left in the 1870s. The distillery itself was built in 1868 and ran until it was turned into a chair factory during Prohibition.

W. Bixby started bottling Old Hermitage in 1909. Old Hermitage bottles had capsules on the top starting around 1915. This bottle did not have a capsule. That's how Josh got the 1909 to 1914 date range.

For more info on all of this stuff see Sjoerd's review and this great discussion between Cowdery and Veach, two bourbon history giants. Josh also referenced the bottle in this interview with Angus (who is himself a giant sponge of whisky insight).

Also, there's this:

In order to pry the cork cleanly from the bottle, The Coop utilized a rare form of Scottish acupuncture:


And it worked perfectly.

It looks like a cross between a shuttlecock and Sputnik.
Does that make it a Sputcock?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
For some zany reason we lined it up against full-powered Thomas H. Handy's 2012 release. And, by gum. It held its own. In fact, it was remarkable.

It all seems like a hazy crazy dream now, four years later. But to make sure this remained in the realm of reality, Josh sent me home with an excellent sample. What a mensch, jeezus.



To make this the official 1000th whisky on The Big Whisk(e)y List I have to give it a score. And I'll do that now, because I feel the weight of the absurd on this number: 93

Okay, you can forget that number now. I'll continue.



So how exactly does one review a rye whiskey that was bottled 100 years ago? I don't know, but I thought I'd try it alongside three enjoyable contemporary ryes. It wasn't just that I wanted to compare the quality, but I also wanted to glean if there was any matching (metaphorical) DNA in their styles.
I'll cut right to it. These younglings got schooled. When compared to Old Hermitage...

(time to shift verb tenses)

...Wild Turkey 101's nose is nutty, loaded with caramel and wood shavings, while the palate is bitter and green.

...Pikesville 6yo has a lot of candy and vanilla in the nose, with grain and smoked nuts in the palate.

...Smooth Ambler Old Scout 7yo's nose is rife with pickles, pine and soil, and its palate is medicinal and briney.

I sincerely like all three of these ryes on their own, but there's a flatness and greenness to them when compared to Old Hermitage. The Pikesville is vaguely the closest in style on the nose, but none has a similar palate. The MGP Smooth Amber has the most distinct style of the three.



And the Old Hermitage Reserve?


The nose is loaded with fruits: clementines, lemons and baked peaches. Then there's shoe leather and anise. Toasted rye bread and almond brittle. It grows dessertier with time, loaded with custards and sugars. Not even a whiff of old bottle funk.

It may be the most drinkable rye I've ever had. The palate has a moderate warmth, close to the 99-101 proof babies, but it doesn't scorch the senses. Add in an excellent balance of characteristics and a silky texture and...oh does it drink. About that balance; think sea salt, brown sugar, citrus juices, mint, toasted barley and earth. No blatant oak, no obvious vanilla. There's something almost alien about that after drinking so many modern whiskies.

The citrus comes on strong in the finish, almost like a single malt. Hints of salt, soil and coal smoke. Something floral joins the gentle sweetness.

Though I'm filled with elation and wonder, a quiet sadness lies beneath, like I've lost something that was okay to lose. It's not the alcohol talking, nor the customary chemical imbalances. Time has passed. Memories gone, distilled down into obstacles and momentum. Maybe that's why this blog is here. A thousand photographs of things mistakenly thought to be distractions. It's just whisky, but that doesn't mean it can't be beautiful. This was a good rye.

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Clynelish 16 year old 1996 AD Rattray for K&L Wine Merchants

I've had this sample for five years. Luckily the sample bottle was still full after all these years. Probably have the polycone seal to thank for that.

This sample was given to me by Tetris, a fellow who indulged in K&L's exclusive bottlings before I did. And, frankly, I don't even remember Driscoll pimping this one. But it exists/existed, as you'll see from the bottle pic near the bottom of the post.

Like Monday's Clynelish, this one was aged in a sherry butt, though I believe it was a refill, as per my sample label. I tasted the two Clynelish side-by-side for their reviews.


Distillery: Clynelish
Ownership: Diageo
Independent Bottler: A. Dewar Rattray
Exclusive to: K&L Wine Merchants
Age: 16 years (8 October 1996 - 17 December 2012)
Maturation: refill sherry butt
Cask#: 8781
Outturn: 555 bottles
Alcohol by Volume: 58.2%
Chillfiltered? No
Caramel Colorant? No
(thank you, Tetris!)

NEAT
The nose is very buttery, and that's all I can smell at first. But after it airs out, notes of brown sugar, brine, peppery sulphur, concrete, apples and grain float up. The palate is better than the nose leads on. It has a balance of brown sugar, citrus and savory. There are also black raisins, cayenne pepper and moldy oak. It gets limier with time. Limes, salt and cayenne in the finish. Very little sweetness to it, sort of like a super dry white wine. But hotter.

DILUTED TO ~46%abv, or > 1½ tsp of water per 30mL whisky
Almost no change to the nose. Maybe some maple, lime and raisins show up. But the palate becomes much easier. Oloroso and earth. Raisins and tart citrus. Chili oil, butter and moldy oak. The finish nearly matches the palate, with a good length and maybe some more sweetness.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
Though I'm not a fan of the strange buttery note, I do like what lies beneath it. The palate is less problematic than the nose, working decently with or without water. Its ABV is almost identical to that of Monday's Clynelish, but it reads less hot. It also comes across slightly more generic compared to the 13yo. I will say this, I'm three Clynelish in, so far, and I'd still pick the 14yo OB over them all.

Availability - Sold out
Pricing - $99.99
Rating - 83

Monday, December 17, 2018

Clynelish 13 year old 1995 Signatory, cask 12792

The Caol Ila-dominant period of this Caol Ila-Clynelish month is over. It's time for two Clynelish in a row. (Note: Clynelish is plural for Clynelish. Is this a thing? Can I make it a thing?)

Both of these Clynelish are from sherry casks. Though, Clynelish #1 Fan often takes issue with sherry cask Clynelish, I don't feel the same. Then again Serge has tried about 20x as many Clynelish as I. So who are you going to side with? Me? Great!

First up, a 13yo single sherry butt from Signatory that was bottled before I started blogging about whisky, which was a looooooooooooong time ago.


Distillery: Clynelish
Ownership: Diageo
Independent Bottler: Signatory
Age: 13 years (21 December 1995 - 15 September 2009)
Maturation: sherry butt
Cask#: 12792
Alcohol by Volume: 58.2%
Chillfiltered? No
Caramel Colorant? No
(from a sample swap with My Annoying Opinions)

NEAT
The nose's top layer consists of dried cherries, soil, rock and kale juice. But its center is all dunnage and burlap. After 20+ minutes small notes of roses and mango appear. Beneath the palate's significant heat are notes of salt and dunnage. There's some sweetness (orange marmalade, maybe?) in the background, and an herbal bite in the middle. With time in glass, a creamy sweetness arises though the heat never subsides. The hot finish is a mix of salt, dunnage, herbal bitterness and citric sweetness.

DILUTED TO ~46%abv, or > 1½ tsp of water per 30mL whisky
The nose gets farmier and fruitier, like overripe cantaloupe rind and flesh. The dunnage and rose notes are subtler. Some wheatgrass in there, and lots of brine. The palate has the burlap and funky dunnage mustiness of the neat nose. Limes follow as does a mild sweetness, stones and a hint of extinguished matches. It MUCH less hot now. The sweetest moment arrives in the finish, reminiscent of citrus hard candies. Some salt and heat follow.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
Though my notes might not say as much, I liked this whisky. The key is getting through the heat. As usual, the nose is the strong point, working with or without dilution. Water cools off the palate and finish improving them. It's lean and mean, feeling old school and spirit-forward. It's certainly not a crowd pleaser. Be sure to see MAO's review (from nearly 6 years ago!) and his comments section for alternate takes.

Availability - Sold out
Pricing - ???
Rating - 86 (with water)

Friday, December 14, 2018

Caol Ila 10 year old Connoisseurs Choice, Gordon & MacPhail

Yes, one of my own bottles! No mooching today!


The above photo was taken a couple weeks before we left California, and that's about the time I salvaged a 2-ounce review sample for the future. And now I'm in the future.

I took no notes while drinking directly from this bottle, but the liquid did vanish quickly. Jordan of Chemistry of the Cocktail reviewed a sample from this bottle back in 2016. I have no idea if other samples are out there somewhere.

Aside from the time I had the privilege of drinking a Caperdonich 1968, I've found the Connoisseurs Choice series to be underwhelming. At least this time there's sherry and peat (probably) involved...


Distillery: Caol Ila
Ownership: Diageo
Region: Islay
Independent Bottler: Gordon & MacPhail
Range: Connoisseurs Choice
Age: 10 years old (???? - ????)
Maturation: refill sherry hogsheads
Alcohol by Volume: 46%
(review sample taken from the bottom third of my bottle)

NEAT
It's the color of straw, so perhaps not that much sherry? Lemons and brown sugar up front in the nose, peat and pepper in the background. Dried stone fruits and mint candy in the midground. After 20 minutes, it's just mint candy and dried fruits, with almost no peat. Bigger peat on the palate, though. Overall, it's sweet and simple, a little floral. More ashy than smoky. It gets ashier, saltier and bitterer with time, then hints of dried berries and vanilla show up. The moderate-length finish has peat, sugar and salt. It gets tangier and bitterer with time.

DILUTED TO ~40%abv, or < 1 tsp of water per 30mL whisky
A straightforward delivery of ash, sugar syrup, mint, brown sugar and lemon zest in the nose. The palate has gotten sweeter and more acidic. The bitterness remains, though the peat is barely there. A note of moldy oak rolls in. The finish is sweet, acidic and mildly peaty.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
On the Whelmed Scale of 1 through 10, this sits at 5, which is better than average (in my experience) for Connoisseurs Choice. It's a perfectly acceptable sipper, one that can be consumed casually and mostly forgotten. The peat is often shy, though not as hidden as the sherry. Though I didn't try the two side by side, I'd say the official Caol Ila 12yo has a full step up on this whisky. So the Caol Ila 10 year old Connoisseurs Choice wasn't worth its $75 price tag. And thus goes my final CC bottle.

One final word, or paragraph, about Connoisseurs Choice. If you peruse the European retail market, you may have noticed Gordon & MacPhail have done a complete packaging and branding overhaul. No more Cask Strength Series. Most G&Ms appear to be Connoisseurs Choice, whether 46%abv or 66%abv, small batch or single barrel. The bottles look sturdier, the labels curvier. As mentioned, the old Connoisseurs Choice always sounded and seemed better than it was. The fact that it had been around for a few decades also brought it some cachet. Goodbye ugly but comfy map labels; hello front-and-center tasting notes. Perhaps the product will be better. Or maybe it's just new visuals for the same whisky.

Availability - American market, a few bottles may still be around
Pricing - $65-$75
Rating - 84

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

Undisclosed Distillery (Caol Ila) 7 year old 2008 Single Cask Nation

While low scores help bring my average ratings back down to Earth, and the usage of online snark can be tasty, panning a whisky gives me little pleasure. (Also, I'm investing liver cells here.) But Monday's Clynelish was crap when neat. The next Clynelish (next week) will be 13 years old, from a different sort of cask and at a lower ABV. So I'm cautiously optimistic.

But enough about Clynelish, because we're back to Caol Ila! Probably.

Today's whisky was labelled "Undisclosed Distillery" by J&J of Single Cask Nation, and is listed as of the "Islay Region". This situation often = Lagavulin. But I was told by someone in the know that this is in fact Caol Ila. And the site says, "We believe this whisky was produced at Islay's powerhouse distillery located near Port Askaig." So there.

Last week's 5 year old CI perfectly illustrated my qualms about all the market's immature single casks, while the 6 year old CI proved the opposite. I'm hoping this will trend towards the 6yo.

Distillery: Undisclosed (Caol Ila)
Ownership: Who knows? (Diageo)
Independent Bottler: Single Cask Nation
Age: 7 years (August 2008 - August 2015)
Maturation: refill bourbon hogshead
Cask: 613-2
Outturn: 235
Alcohol by Volume: 57.8%
Chillfiltered? No
Caramel Colorant? No
(Thanks to Brett for the sample! Again!)

NEAT
Pine sap, confectioner's sugar, wheatgrass, cocoa and kirsch on the nose. The peat smoke starts off delicate, but builds with time, hoisting up a marzipan note along the way. The palate is less hot than I'd expected. There's plenty of sea salt, smoked peanuts and woody peat smoke. Also tart limes and marzipan. A little bit of ganja. A little bit more honeyed sweetness. It finishes warm and peaty. Lots of limes and nuts. It gets sweeter with time.

DILUTED TO ~46%abv, or 1½ tsp of water per 30mL whisky
The nose becomes farmy barny. Also plenty of orange zest, simple syrup, ocean air and cream of wheat. The palate balances citrus, sugar, vanilla and peat. It also has some smaller floral, peppery and savory notes. It finishes sweet and floral with a puff of wood smoke.

WORDS WORDS WORDS
I'm going to guess this was a second-fill hoggie because there's some actual maturation here and a touch of good American oak (when diluted). It's still a youngster, but it's not palate-stripping. The salt, citrus and nuts worked well, though the sweetness got a bit aggressive. But no huge plusses, no huge minuses. Sturdy at seven years. Though at that price...

Availability - Sold out
Pricing - $125
Rating - 83