...where distraction is the main attraction.

Friday, July 13, 2012

A Job Interview and a Smoothie

Had my first job interview in 9 years yesterday.  I must say, I have the utmost respect for the folks out there going to dozens of interviews trying to hunt down a job.  My interviewers (a panel of three) didn't have much in the way of specific questions and I felt like I had to be the energy behind the interview.  They also looked like they didn't particularly want to be there.  It may have been early, but couldn't they have even attempted to return a smile?

It was all very odd and empty, but necessary, I guess.  I'm all for new experiences and I should probably get better at interviews.  My bizarro work background isn't going to bowl anyone over, so I must seduce my future employers with my plentiful charm via braiding my nose hairs.

Around 8:30 in the morning, on the way to the interview, I crossed over the LA River into Wilmington.  As the bridge sloped down, I felt as if I was descending into a contemporary version Dante Alighieri's dreams.  Dark gloom, gloms of smoke belched into the air, oil refineries, rusting abandoned train cars, and barbed-wire-surrounded dumps.

I thought about the elusiveness of peace, joy, and spiritual contentment.  The perfect mental state to start an interview.  When I got home later, I saw this video sitting in my YouTube "Likes" list.  Thought it was appropriate.


On the other hand, California is in prime fruit season.  All the stone fruits are delicious right now, especially the peaches.  The berries are still scrumptious too.  So we have a ton of fruit in our home.

Being a Smoothie Man (but only post-workout), I had the revolutionary idea to use only fresh fruit in this morning's protein smoothie.  A peach, overripe raspberries and strawberries, raspberry yogurt, a splash of soy milk, vanilla whey protein, ice, and a drizzle of honey.

It was grand.  Possibly my best protein smoothie ever.  I'll let this cat describe it further.


Happy Friday!

Thursday, July 12, 2012

NOT Single Malt Report: North of Scotland 43yr 1964 Scott's Selection Single Grain Whisky

Yes, I have reviewed this one before.  But I am reporting on it a second time because:

1.  It's a 43 year old whisky, damn it!  I'll likely never drink anything older.
2.  The price was right.
3.  And if those weren't good enough reasons, here's a better one.  THIS time I was not drunk when I took the notes.


Distillery: North of Scotland
Bottler: Scott's Selection
Age: 43 years (1964 - 2007)
Maturation: Bourbon cask
Region: Highlands (Southern)
Alcohol by Volume: 45.7%


THE DISTILLERY

North of Scotland was first named Strathmore Distillery when it was built in 1957 by George Christie (the owner of Speyside Distillery).  It changed its name to North of Scotland in 1964, which is ironic since it's at the very southern tip of the Highlands.  It was originally intended for single malt production via Coffey stills, but switched to the cheaper grain whisky in 1960.  At that time it was the smallest grain whisky distillery in the land with a capacity around 3 million liters.  It was closed in 1980, sold to DCL (neo-Diageo) in 1982, and then dismantled in 1993.  And, apparently, it used to be haunted by a former brewer.

THE BOTTLER

As per Scott's Selection's website, Robert Scott had been employed by George Christie and the Speyside Distillery as a Master Distiller for a number of years.  After his retirement, Scott formed this independent bottling company (which seems to be based in The Netherlands).  Happily, he was able to use his connections to grab some casks of unusual stuff, including at least three casks of North of Scotland grain whisky.

THE DRINKING SITUATION

Gallagher's (in Long Beach) has had a bottle of this since Kristen and I moved to town.  And they were selling a glass of this 43-year-old whisky for $8......don't think about how crazy that is.  Think about how awesome that is.  For $8:  Dewars 12 or North of Scotland 43?  Yeah, I thought so.  (FYI, Seven Grand downtown has this at $48 a glass.)

The bartender poured me the last of the bottle on June 13th; a very generous pour I must say.  I got a good look at the bottle this time.  Scribbled in black marker on the back of the bottle was: $20.00.  Did someone get it at an auction for $20?  Or was the bar supposed to be selling it for $20?  No one knew.

Thus I enjoyed my 2 to 3 ounce pour of Lyndon Baines Johnson-era whisky for less than a dram of Black Label.  Mark that up as a good evening.

THE WHISKY NOTES

I only tried this neat out of respect of this great situation.  So...

NEAT:
Color -- light maple syrup
Nose -- TONS (or would that be cords?) of oak, very candied, honey-roasted, wheaty & corny, bananas
Palate -- woody (as in licking a tree), Mentos candies, cherries, sweet wine, banana pudding meets baklava but not in a good way, corn syrup
Finish -- "Woah, hella sweet", cinnamoncornsyrupbrownsugar assault with some bitterness in the background

You may notice my notes here are different the previous report on the same whisky.  That's because, as mentioned above, my senses were not compromised.

It's not as bourbony as I'd previously thought.  It was quite sweet though, but an old tired sweet, as if the whisky was like, "It's been forty-eight years, someone just finish me off already."  The corn sweetness leads me to think that maize was the main grain in the mash.  That particular flavor isn't my cup of tea, though it does often show up in American hooch.  Despite all of that, it was my honored pleasure to put this whisky to sleep.

Availability - You'll have to do some searchin'
Pricing
 -
Good at $200, considering that it's almost as old as Jamie Moyer

Rating - 77

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

NOT Single Malt Report: Compass Box Hedonism Blended Grain Whisky

Last Tuesday I posted a report on the first of three single grain whiskys -- Cambus 18yr 1991 -- sampled on a March 10th Taste Off.  It was better than I had expected and gained a bit of character when water was added.  The following Thursday, I reported on a North British 20yr 1991 single cask single grain whisky which completely transformed into a fascinating whisky with the added water.  Today, I'll take a look at the last whisky of this grain Taste Off.


Company: Compass Box
Bottling: Hedonism
Type: Blended Grain
Distilleries: Different combinations of Cameron Bridge, Carsebridge, Cambus, Port Dundas and/or Dumbarton (depending on batch number)
Maturation: first-fill ex-bourbon American Oak
Age: 14 to 29 years old
Alcohol by Volume: 43%

Hedonism (great name!) is a blended grain whisky.  This means that it's a blend of ONLY single grain whiskies.  And in that approach, it's almost alone on the market.  The only other blended grain that I know of is The Snow Grouse, and the best thing I've heard about that one is it's best left for mixing.  Hedonism on the other hand has gotten considerably more positive attention.

Its creator is Compass Box, a small independent blending company led by John Glaser.  Before starting Compass Box, Glaser worked in the wine industry and then later spent a number of years in marketing for the big Johnnie Walker brand.  He left that job to turn his hobby of blending whiskies at home into a business.  And over the last dozen years he's become the face of the new school rule-challenging independent blenders.  Compass Box has released blended whiskies, blended malts, and this blended grain.  Per an interview with David Driscoll, Glaser said that he'd always been a grain whisky enthusiast and that great things could be done with high quality single grains.  In that, he found a place where the market was wide open.

I'm excited to try any and all of the Compass Box products; I'll probably buy the Great King Street blend blind before the year is out.  But this one, Hedonism, was so different that it was hard not be intrigued.  So I picked up a dram of it from Master of Malt and added it to this Taste Off.  (Note: It's different than the two whiskys from last week in that it's not a single and not cask strength.)

There are also many different batches of Hedonism with slightly different combos as Compass Box produces it in small quantities, annually.  I'm pretty sure this is from last year's batch, but I'm not 100% certain.

TASTING NOTES

NEAT --
In the glass, the color is a dark chardonnay.  The nose is lovely.  It's fresh, bright, full of vanilla bean.  It's a plate of ice cream profiteroles.  The texture is creamy and very smooth.  The palate starts on bananas and brown sugar, then something lightly fruity slips in.  A note between citrus and cherries.  It has a finish of moderate length, full of brown sugar.

WITH WATER (approx 37.9% ABV) --
Water brings out the bourbon notes.  The nose is mostly vanilla and a rye-less mid-aged bourbon.  The palate is also big on the bourbon and oakier with a tropical fruit note.  The finish is mild yet pleasantly sweet.

COMMENTS

This is one dangerously drinkable whisky.  It's very mellow and easygoing, but not lazy in flavor.  I think its character holds up best without water, as Compass Box found the right ABV point at 43%.  While the two grain whiskies reported on last week had more exciting elements pop up, Hedonism was the most consistent and enjoyable sample in the Taste Off.

If I were to purchase a grain whisky, this would be the one.  The pricing -- while appearing to be on the steep side -- takes into consideration the old whisky ingredients (up to 29 years) as well as Compass Box's independent set up.  The other good news: it's available in the United States.

Availability - Some US spirits specialists
Pricing - alone on the market, so it sets the pace at $90-$100
Rating - 83


Tomorrow, a bonus single grain report!

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Post #300: My career and I part ways

A year ago, I quit my very stable production accountant occupation to focus on screenwriting full time.  Things were looking brighter than usual on my projects; a career opportunity seemed be materializing through the haze.  Kristen and I agreed that this would be the best time for me to set aside my job to invest myself in the craft I'd been honing for fifteen years.

Two weeks ago, I ended my working relationship with my managers.  I'd been with them for three years and this severance was a mutual decision.  We had different reasons behind the decision -- their company was bought out by a larger production company which brought them different responsibilities -- but we agreed this was the best course of action.  I have a lot of respect for those guys and I personally liked the producers I've worked with.  And to be honest, I fouled some of this up myself.  Inconsistent scheduling, fear, wobbly confidence, and frustration prevented me from putting more words on the page.

So, what I write in this post is about the career, not the good people I've worked with.



Cinema has been one of my true loves for the last fifteen years.  It's been an immersion.  I lost track of how many films I'd seen, a long time ago.  It was well over the two thousand count before Netflix came along.  My two years of film school were probably the best years of my life.

Though I was a poem and short story writer before I was bitten by the film writing bug, the poison from the script bite ran deep.  It surged through my veins, reached my heart, then spread into my brain.  It was like heroin at the start.  I wrote feature-length scripts with lunatic passion, ditching sleep in order to power out draft after draft.

The energy slowed after a few years.  My projects were more carefully chosen; I wanted to sell something.  Yet, ironically, my scripts became more independent and less commercial.  Some garnered raves and attention and pitches with producers, but nothing stuck enough to begin a professional career.

I tried to set it aside and work at a 9 to 5 job, but for those few years I felt the lack.  So I got back into it.  Almost four years ago, I started on a fresh new project.  That script got the attention I'd been waiting for for so long.  It brought my managers to me.  Meetings followed.  My professional screenwriting career officially began.

And now it's likely over.  I'm attempting to work on a project or two with friends, something small, but have found that the fruitlessness and disappointment from the last three years have overwhelmed my creative energy.  I've stopped enjoying writing.

I always foresaw the potential of that happening, but I had hoped that at least I'd be paid for my efforts.  Compromise and rejection are always part of the job, but my struggle and failure happened for free.  I'm a bit older now, a bit angrier, less of a masochist than that pudgy Afro-y film school kid; so I have no issues with trying to sell my craft.  Compliments are all well and good, but they won't pay for groceries.  Nevertheless, 99% of my creative efforts over the last fifteen years have been without compensation.

So if I'm going to write for free, I'm going to do it my way.

And, aside from a possible small project or two, it won't be for any sort of motion picture.

The Movies and I have gone on to separate paths.  For years, everyone I've known has seen more contemporary films than I.  It has gotten to the point that even most of the indy flicks are regurgitating stories and themes in ways that break no new ground.  Occasionally there'll be a Tree of Life or Enter the Void, but most of the time it's a lot of Battleship and Madea (not the Greek one).  And now that I've been (briefly) a short order cook in the kitchen, now that I've seen what dishes are going to be served tomorrow, I'm not dining here anymore.  If I'm drawn to anything cinematic, it's old Avant Garde:  Man Ray, Cocteau, and Vertov tinkering with a new power.  Maybe, later on, some Brackage.

The structures I've been obeying no longer interest me.

I miss words.  I miss stretching out.  I miss the joy.

And I have to get a job now.  I've blown through much of my savings -- on living necessities, not whisky -- and my household requires more income.  So, I've joined up with a pair of employment agencies to see what I can get on the Finance front.

I'm separating myself from film a bit.  I'm selling off a chunk of my DVD collection today and I've cancelled all of my online film-related subscriptions.  Where I can increase the distance, I will, without regret.

People still read things, with or without hyperlinks.  There's a place for my skill set somewhere, but it's not going to be a segment of someone else's grand plan.

At night, in the quiet, I often think about the hardest part of all.  How can I keep from regretting my rare moment of optimism one year ago?

Monday, July 9, 2012

Sad and Happy Single Malt Ramblings on a Monday

Relatively confident in an LA source for future bottles, I opened my Wild Turkey 101 Rye this weekend.  It is good.  And it is fantastic in a Sazerac, a rare whisk(e)y cocktail that I actually enjoy.  Take a gander at this video by Chris McMillian for a great Sazerac How-To.

The Ardbeg Ten bottle was retired, thus opening a spot in the Whisky Closet for the WT101.  Hope to do a report on this hard-to-find Turkey next month.



Bruichladdich distillery, the face of creative and experimental independent whisky making, has announced that they are selling to drinks giant Remy Cointreau.

Questions remain.  What will happen to their grand mad scientist Master Blender Jim McEwan?  Are the rumors of his retirement true?  Will an access to more resources allow for a price drop in their products?  Or will their already steep prices swell further?

Jim McEwan and the distillery's independence were not only responsible for the products' quality, but are also the two major selling points for Bruichladdich itself.  Lose those them and what are we (and Remy Cointreau) left with?



SKU posted a dynamite Recent Eats piece entitled "The Golden Age of Whiskey is Over" last week.  It's right on; he's more realist than cynic in tone and message.  The comments that followed were fascinating as bloggers, craft distillers, and retailers weighed in.



Finally for a smile, there's a video (below).

First, some context.  Ralfy, the man with the hat, is the king of whisky vlogs.  Boisterous, funny, and candid, he's the owner of a well-earned set of opinions (and a set of whiskys).  The quiet Frenchman on the left is the king, period.  Serge.  Serge started blogging whisky reviews TEN years ago.  His site whiskyfun.comnow has over 8000 reviews.  Not a single one of those reviews were quickly tossed off, instead each shows considerable consideration.  Besides having sensory superpowers, Serge has a great sense of humor and is always quick to make fun of himself.

Serge rarely does written interviews, and when he does he's always humble.  Yet this here......this has to be a first.  He does a video interview!  There's a voice attached to the man!

For me, as a whisky nerd, this won the Internet last week.

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Single Malt Report Standings as of July 7, 2012

It's been two weeks since the previous standings post.  Let us see how things have changed.

(My methodology uses pageview counts from three different sources in an attempt to suss out which posts are spammer heavy and which ones are getting the real clicky traffic.  Then I apply a very (not) sophisticated algorithm.  And from that I get a Top Ten.)

SINGLE MALT REPORT STANDINGS AS OF 7/7/2012 (out of 82 posts):

#10  Lauder's Blended Scotch Whisky -4
After two weeks of travelling upwards, Lauder's experiences two weeks of descent.  It may grow to love this spot after a while.

#9  The Macallan 12-year-old Single Malt -2
Mac12 drops another two spots.  I wouldn't count this one out entirely.  As Macallan's recent news spreads this may see some more hits.

#8  Millstone 8-year-old French Oak, Dutch Single Malt NC
Remained in place, though Mac12 is very close.

#7 Powers Gold Label (Blended Irish Whiskey) +3
Yay!  A big Powers boost.  I don't know why, but it's okay with me.

#6  The Macallan 18-year-old Single Malt +3
Perhaps thanks to the Macallan news, this one had the biggest view percentage leap of any post.  Enough to get within spittin' distance of the top five.

#5 Chivas Regal 12-year-old Blended Scotch Whisky NC
Getting closer to #4, but won't really challenge it for another month.

#4  J&B Rare Blended Scotch Whisky NC
This one's staying put for a while.

#3  The Glenlivet 15-year-old French Oak Reserve Single Malt NC
She'll be treading water for the foreseeable future.

#2  The Famous Grouse Blended Scotch Whisky NC
Views have slowed abruptly, but it's so far ahead of #3 that it won't be going anywhere either.

#1  Glenfiddich 12-year-old Single Malt NC
Number one.  Carve it in stone.



BIG MOVERS

UP
No huge jumps over two weeks.
Kilbeggan Irish Blended Whiskey moves up 7 spots to #23
Jameson Blended Irish Whiskey hops up 7 to get to #38
Strathisla 12-year-old Single Malt jumps up 6 spots to enter the Top Thirty.  That's 15 spots in 3 weeks.
Vegas 2012 edition, part 1 of 4 reverses its downward trend, moving 6 spots upwards to #40
Bulleit Rye Whiskey continues its climb, jumping 5 spots to 33rd place.  It's moved 18 rankings in three weeks.  With the rye shortages out there, maybe there's increasing interest in this well-stocked whiskey?

DOWN
Lots of big drops though, which I'll explain in the Notes section.
Connemara Cask Strength Irish Single Malt drops 9 places to #46
Powers 12-year-old Special Reserve falls 9 to teeter on the edge of the Top Fifty
Longrow CV Single MaltMackmyra First Edition Swedish Single Malt, and the Sauternes Finish Taste Off all fell 9 spots, knocking them out of the Top Fifty.

NOTES FOR THIS WEEK, BAD PREDICTIONS FOR NEXT WEEK

Four rookies entered the Top Fifty this week, pushing a number of other posts downwards to make room.  The newbies included the entire recent Ardbeg Taste Off and the Ardmore Trad Cask.  The new Ardbeg Ten report even opened in 37th.

The Top Twenty finally gained a new member and will definitely have some movement before the next report.  Any movement in the Top Ten will likely be limited to #7 thru #10 for at least a month.  And I don't foresee any rookies cracking the Top Fifty for at least the next two weeks.

Of course, I've been consistently wrong in my predictions, so who knows?!

I'll check back in with the next standings post in two weeks to see how this all plays out.  Thanks again for reading!  Have a great, safe weekend!

Friday, July 6, 2012

Dwain Esper's NARCOTIC and MANIAC

While prepping dinner last night, I watched Kino's DVD double feature of Dwain Esper's Narcotic and Maniac.

From kino.com
Esper is one of the grandpappies of the American exploitation film.  An Esper film consists of vaguely connected scenes filmed using considerably amateur production methods, with then-lurid drug and sexual material scattered throughout.  He would then list medical "facts" on title cards throughout the movie and thus would claim his film was for educational purposes only.  Because these works were produced outside the mainstream American studio system, Esper was forced to find ways to exhibit them on his own.  The need to advertise his films gave birth to the great exploitation film posters.  For instance:

(Source)
I'm actually a big fan of old exploitation films.  They were the original cinema indies.  The folks making them were truly on their own, free from studio support and studio restrictions, so the results were storytelling labors of love.  I find that unique struggle very inspirational, even though the films were often terribly made.

Dwain Esper's films are TERRIBLY made.  I mean, just abysmal.  He makes Ed Wood look like Howard Hawks.  And I don't think that's not hyperbole.

Of the double feature, Narcotic (1933) seems to be the better work.  There was a storyline, occasionally a fully-formed scene, acting effort, consistent lighting, and a stab (sorry) at character development.  Like Esper's "educational" films, Narcotic is a cautionary tale, in this case it's about Doctor William Davis.  Running a free medical clinic eventually wears Davis down and he's lured into an opium den by his friend(?) Wu.  He then goes from opiate addict to drug dealer.  He makes good money as a drug huckster, but eventually the drug ruins his life and leads to suicide.

Despite the limp filmmaking, the story is quite sad.  Watching a free clinic doctor who'd once assisted the less able of society sacrifice everything in his life for The H becomes an absorbing experience.  Particularly melancholy are the sequences in the opium den wherein prostrate addicts give up their universe to the smoke.

from moviegoods.com
Towards the end of the film, Esper starts inserting images of animals fighting, killing, and eating each other.  He'd repeat this stylistic flourish in future films, though never as well as he did here: predators stalking pray and snakes consuming each other as heroin addicts fight over the remaining powder.

I'm not saying that the film is well made.  If you haven't watched your share of exploitation films, then your patience may be short once the bad acting, clumsy stereotypes, and indifferent editing kick in.  BUT, it's considerably better than Esper's followup.

Maniac (1934) is likely the worst film I have ever seen.  It is Manos Hands of Fate bad.  At times it seems like a sophomoric spoof......but there was nothing like it yet to parody.  It is such a stumble downwards from Narcotic, that I wonder if Esper had a drug issue of his own.

Each scene never connects (logically, structurally, nor cinematically) with the previous and succeeding scenes.  The dialogue unnecessarily tells us what we're already seeing, does nothing to move the story along, is inconsistent with the character speaking it, and is usually utter nonsense.  The characters' personalities keep changing every two minutes, so their actions make no sense.  The actors tasked to portray these characters appear to never know which emotion they need to show and barely get their insipid lines out (probably because they don't understand the dialogue either).  Characters show up then vanish -- including a rapey psychopath who seems important to the story or something.  The lighting is all over the place, the sound is terrible, and the editor seems to have died at the flatbed after watching hours of completely out of focus footage.

It's quite epic really.  I could tell you the story but it wouldn't make sense.  It starts out Frankenstein, goes to Cask of Amontillado, throws in a little Black Cat, a bit of Jekyll & Hyde, there's a man with 1000 cats who eat rats who eat dead cats, a wife suddenly shows up (played by Phyllis Diller?), a "cat fight", an actual cat fight, super adrenaline tinctures used for several inconsistent purposes, a full movie makeup kit in a doctor's office, a guy who pokes out a cat's eyeball then eats it, and the whole thing's tied up with a bunch of "educational" warnings that people are crazy.

By the time the anticipated nudie shots roll in, this viewer felt bad for the topless girl.  No matter how cherry her figure was, the fact that she seemed to be in a snuff film tempered any excitement over here.

(Source)

I'm not really sure what happened to Esper in the year between these two films.  Narcotic showed the promise of an affecting and effective storyteller within the exploitation genre.  Maniac looked like the stoned musings of a handicapped four-year-old.

Many of Esper's films are in the public domain and can be found at the (SUPER!) Internet Archive.  The Kino DVD has better quality video as well as some good special features, including a snippet from the very enjoyable Maciste in Hell (a version of it here on YouTube).

(Source)