Two-and-a-half years later, while dusty hunting, I saw this 375mL bottle of an older version of the Grouse:
I didn't really know what I was doing at the time, but I did see that it was bottled at 86 proof and the label looked old. Because it had no tax strip, it was from after 1985. And with its "proof" measurement, it was from before 1990. It also had this weird label issue on the back:
The first thing I noticed was that the whisky was good. I mean, like so good I actually looked forward to pouring a glass of this Famous Grouse. Because it was 375mL it was consumed quickly. Luckily, I saved a sample just for this tasting.
Brand: The Famous Grouse
Current ownership: The Edrington Group
Type: Scotch Blended Whisky
Age: minimum 3 years
Alcohol by Volume: 43%
Bottled: probably between 1986 and 1989
The color is a dark orange gold. Right up front, the nose is very fruity -- tangerines, loquats, and cantaloupe. A little bit of brine, some honey, some caramel sauce. Biscotti, the occasional peep of vanilla extract, and malt. The moderately sweet palate has load of malt right up front. Lots of salt. Lots of spiciness -- yes, pepper and cinnamon, but also cloves. Tart lemons and a wee musty note. The caramel and musty note grow with time in the glass. The lemons turn tangy in the medium length finish. A hint of burnt raisins. Toffee, malt, and a peppery bite that grows with time, filling the mouth.
This malt bomb doesn't even remotely resemble the current Famous Grouse. Either its single malt element was enormous or the producers found a grain whisky that complimented it well. I don't know where the fruity element comes from. Maybe bourbon cask Macallan? Or Glenturret? Not only is it better than almost all of today's major blends, but it's better than many starter single malts (and basically any OB from Glenrothes, which is an ingredient of the current Grouse). Though he has different notes than I, Serge was a big fan of a 40%abv 1985 French version of Grouse, so take that as you may. I'm not going to make any grandiose statements, like this is better than everything, but it's a killer deal if found at a sub-$25 price and by comparison it makes the current version of Grouse seem gross. What the hell happened, Edrington?
Bottled: probably between 1986 and 1989
The color is a dark orange gold. Right up front, the nose is very fruity -- tangerines, loquats, and cantaloupe. A little bit of brine, some honey, some caramel sauce. Biscotti, the occasional peep of vanilla extract, and malt. The moderately sweet palate has load of malt right up front. Lots of salt. Lots of spiciness -- yes, pepper and cinnamon, but also cloves. Tart lemons and a wee musty note. The caramel and musty note grow with time in the glass. The lemons turn tangy in the medium length finish. A hint of burnt raisins. Toffee, malt, and a peppery bite that grows with time, filling the mouth.
This malt bomb doesn't even remotely resemble the current Famous Grouse. Either its single malt element was enormous or the producers found a grain whisky that complimented it well. I don't know where the fruity element comes from. Maybe bourbon cask Macallan? Or Glenturret? Not only is it better than almost all of today's major blends, but it's better than many starter single malts (and basically any OB from Glenrothes, which is an ingredient of the current Grouse). Though he has different notes than I, Serge was a big fan of a 40%abv 1985 French version of Grouse, so take that as you may. I'm not going to make any grandiose statements, like this is better than everything, but it's a killer deal if found at a sub-$25 price and by comparison it makes the current version of Grouse seem gross. What the hell happened, Edrington?
Availability - Happy Hunting!
Pricing - ???
Rating - 84