source |
Region: Islay
Series: The Ultimate
Age: 12 years (13 Feb 2007 - 9 Jan 2020)
Maturation: 1st fill sherry butt
Cask #: 592
Alcohol by Volume: 58.1%
source |
Full Strength 65.65%abv | Diluted to 50%abv | Diluted to 46%abv | Diluted to 43%abv |
---|---|---|---|
On one level the nose shows Luxardo cherries, orange peel, milk chocolate and caramel chews. But there's also plenty of nail polish remover and perfume present. It trends towards vanilla and banana peel after some time in the glass. | A big shift in the nose. Think pear-infused mead up front, vanilla and Luxardo cherries in the middle, and cologne in the background. | The nose has simplified and focused on vanilla frosting, caramel chews, and menthol. | Hmmm. Wet cardboard, sawdust, perfume in the nose's foreground. Vanilla, bananas, and black cherry soda in the back. |
The palate is really hot, nearly unapproachably so. Barrel char, salt, vanilla syrup, limes, and tannins remain behind the fire. | Nice. The palate is loaded with oranges and coated with honey. A little bit of vanilla here, some cracked pepper there. | Like the nose, the palate has simplified. It's sweet and salty, with a menthol rinse and some drying tannins. | The palate is sweet, very oaky, with minor notes of pineapple and bitterness. |
Once the burn subsides, one may find barrel char and peppercorns in the finish. Some savory smoke too, though that may be a cooked palate. | It finishes very sweetly, with a little bit of lemon and barrel char. | It finishes sweet, salty, and tannic. | The sweet and tannic finish doesn't last long. |
Summary: Not a fan. Reminds me of the early batches of Stagg Junior, with two dimensions (raw ethyl and raw oak) destroying everything else. | Summary: What a change! I'd be happy to drink this again, at 50%abv. The honey + fruit is a nice combo. | Summary: I appreciate this spartan style. It ain't deep, but it is drinkable. | Summary: Again, the whiskey fell apart at this strength, collapsing into a thin mush. |
Monday's post may have come across a bit harsh. Mondays gotta Monday. So I'll try to soften it:
It has come to my attention that I also enjoyed the 2021 batch of Jack Daniel's 10-year-old, so that makes two Brown-Forman products that didn't cause my palate to jump out of my mouth. Also, the 76-point score I gave to Monday's JDSBBP barrel is a hell of a lot higher than I'd give to the current Old No. 7 (which would get something between a 36 and 56).
Does that provide some perspective? No? Okay, I kinda tried.
It's Wednesday now, and I'm trying another one of Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Barrel Proof barrel barrels. It's a teensy bit stronger, and I think it's a more recent release.
Full Strength 65.45%abv | Diluted to 50%abv | Diluted to 46%abv | Diluted to 43%abv |
---|---|---|---|
The bourbony nose is loaded with cherries and caramels. Some raspberry jam, red bean paste, and a hint of brine as well. Not hot! | A desserty nose: butterscotch budino, pound cake, and dried blueberries. | The nose changes with each dilution. Now it has plum wine, blueberry pie, and a just a whiff of butterscotch. | Pretty nose. Stewed and baked berries, orange peel, and caramel up top, basic barrel char underneath. |
The palate is hot, of course, but it doesn't hide the sweet cherries, candy corn, mild peppery tannins, and a slight umami note. | Ah, the bitter oak appears here in the palate. It's met by sweet oranges, mint leaf, and a hint of ginger. It gets pepperier with time. | Bitter oak is replaced by more palatable peppery tannins. Tart fresh cranberries + sweetened dried cranberries. Raspberries and ginger. | Not much left of the palate. It's lightly bitter, sweet, and peppery. |
It finishes with sweet cherries and wood spice. | Bitter oak, tangy chiles, and little bit of sweetness in the finish. | It finishes with plum jam, ginger, and pepper. | Quiet finish made of pepper and salt. |
Summary: Though it's big and oaky, I like it. Can imagine it as a hearty colder weather pour. | Summary: Delightful nose, less-than-delightful palate. The bitterness taints it. | Summary: Its parts are most in tune with each other at this strength. And its bitterness has vanished. | Summary: The whiskey ran out of steam here, with too much dilution being the culprit. It still smells great though. |
Once upon a time, circa 2015, Brown-Forman announced a new product called Jack Daniel's Single Barrel Barrel Proof (yes, more barrels in the name than in the whiskey). I saw the announcement on Twitter, and retweeted it with my always insightful analysis. I can't find the tweet, but I'm pretty sure it was:
#barf.
Some Twitter followers took umbrage to my observation and replied with similarly honed reflections along the lines of:
Y U mad bro.
There were three reasons Y I mad bro.
Full Strength 64.9%abv | Diluted to 50%abv | Diluted to 46%abv | Diluted to 43%abv |
---|---|---|---|
The nose is approachable! Peanut butter fudge, mint leaf, and carob arrive first, followed by sundae cherries and burnt tree bark. | The nose has more vanilla and pastry. A few dried apricots with a dash of clover honey and a splash of balsamic vinegar. | A straightforward mix of mint, menthol, lemon, and barrel char fills the nose. | Wood spice and a mix of citrus zests in the front, and jasmine blossoms in the back of the nose. |
The palate is HOT, surprise! It's also peppery, sweet, and minty, with piles of burnt wood, and a hint of earth. | More approachable, but still very oaky, in fact here's where the bitter oak arrives, in the palate. Some decent tart limes mix with honey and cinnamon. | Like the nose, the palate is more focused: ginger, bitter oak, and sour citrus. | The bitter oak mellows out in the palate, which is now mildly sweet and filled with caramel and mint. |
The finish is all hot char, menthol, and lime. | Hot char and limes again in the finish, but with some honey too. | It finishes with sour citrus, heat, and bitter oak. | It finishes tart, bitter, and woody. |
Summary: The nose is kinda nice, but the mouth's oak and heat assault overwhelms all else, predictably. | Summary: I'm loving the nose here, and the palate improved...until the bitter oak appeared. The finish remains monolithic. | Summary: The citric acidity and woody bitterness were almost unpalatable. I considered dumping the rest at this point. | Summary: A big improvement over the 46%. The finish remains the weak point, but I could see how this would work for cocktails or casual summer sipping. |
Yay! The annual Littlemill! Rather than pouring the usual 20+ year old thing, I have a 10yo 1989 with a punch-in-the-esophagus strength of 63.8%abv. Yeah, I should have saved this for Mathilda's 10th birthday, but I want the punishment now.
Does anyone know why Cadenhead single casks were often bottled young and outrageously hot in the 1990s? Was there a cask management issue? Or did they blow through their most fabulous stuff during the dumpy bottle era?
Because this whisky may require a lot of water, I'm going to drink it in the bathtub.
I'm starting this tasting with a diluted pour so I don't burn my senses too early.
DILUTED to ~46%abv, or 2¼ tsp per 30mL whisky
The nose begins with grapefruit, cardamom, and ethyl up front and some OBE funk in the background. Across 30 minutes, it shifts to roses, orange peel, and moss. The palate also moves around over time. It starts with a surprising mix of coffee grounds, raw cocoa, and saltines. Then it becomes floral and sweet, with a metallic hint in the corner. Vanilla and lemon zest appear later. It finishes with lemons and raw cocoa.
NEAT
Much brighter and more stable at full strength, the nose shows flower blossoms, plums, citronella, raspberry candy, and ginger ale, as well as an earthy hint in the background. There's the coffee and cocoa in the palate again, but now tart lemons, bitter melon rinds, and bitter herbs join in. Perhaps it's the 30+ minutes of breathing time (for the whisky), but it's very approachable at this strength. Coffee and limes fill the finish, along with hints of metal and bitter herbs.
WORDS WORDS WORDS
Dear Cadenhead management of 24 years ago, why did you pull this bun out of the oven so early? Yeah, the whisky is kinda cool and funny, but was anyone really in a rush to buy super-high-proof 10 year old Lowland whisky in 1999? Sincerely, Some guy who could finally legally drink in 1999.
As noted above, I gave this Littlemill some time to air out, which may be why I liked it better at cask strength. It's still exhausting stuff, mostly of interest for educational purposes. Though I welcome all the tart citrus in this single malt, it actually makes me appreciate 20+ year old Littlemill even more, as that characteristic lives on for another decade or more in the cask, becoming better integrated and more complex.
Looking forward to next year's Littlemill...
Availability - Sold out
Pricing - ???
Rating - 83 (neat only)
After I spent two weeks in Japan, three weeks of semi-normalcy passed before the girls' mother left for an Asian business trip for two weeks. Yes, two weeks of pure, unfiltered single father life. My daughters survived and I occasionally succeeded at parenting. Laundry and dishes were washed nonstop, down in the creek. LOLz. Friday the 12th was my first night back on my own, so I planned to celebrate. And I did celebrate......by sleeping for 10.5 hours. Then napped throughout the weekend.
Work arrived on Monday, but so did Mathilda's NINTH birthday. She happily devoured sushi like a champ for her birthday dinner. Yes, she's a 9 year old who enjoys sushi. I didn't like the stuff until I was 22, and still required sake to power it down at the time, so she's really two decades ahead of me.
And now it's Tuesday, and I should probably start posting this week's whisky things, specifically this year's Mathilda Malts, a trio of long gone single malts, including one mandatory Littlemill!
First up, a Millburn, one of the trio Inverness distilleries murdered by DCL in the '80s. Though today's sample was from a recent bottle split, I allegedly tried this whisky eight years ago but left no notes behind. (Here's The Whiskey Jug's review of the bottle from that event.) Here's the label from that bottle:
Some of you folks may remember the G&M Reserve series from ye olden days. For those who found whisky after this range perished, just know that if G&M were to restart it today, every bottle would cost at least four figures, like the Private Collection but with cheaper packaging. Do I need to say that the Reserve bottles were barely three figures? No, I don't need to say that.
Alas, a Millburn.
The 17/2/2003 SMWS Glen Gariochs keep going and keep shining! Clearly the stills were rocking that day, but where were these first-fill barrels from? With Beam Suntory in charge of the distillery, the barrels could have previously held Knob Creek, Booker's, Baker's, Basil Hayden, Makers, or regular ol' Beam. No matter what, I'm already much more interested in teenage bourbon barrel Glen Gariochs than I was before.
Today's single barrel has a strength and outturn similar to Tuesday's, so I tried them side-by-side. How identical were the whisky results?