Sort of and sort of. There's another Alt-something distillery and my misgivings about Allt-à-Bhainne were misguided since I enjoyed the subsequent Berry Bros sample.
But what about that self-proclaimed boutique (I'm not writing that name out) bottler?
I'm trying to keep an open mind. Blue text, you're getting as jaded as I.
I've been trying to fight it.
Good luck with that.
And good luck with that whole open mind thing.
Thanks.
Yes, we're moving on to a pair of Aultmores this week. I'd never tried an Aultmore before these reviews so I had no idea what to expect. All I knew is that it was (like Aberfeldy) a main ingredient in Dewar's and that (like with Aberfeldy) Bacardi Inc plays Silas Stingy with its barrels, rarely letting any escape to the independent bottlers. That Dewar's element doesn't work in its favor for me, but I was hoping that, perhaps, Bacardi put aside the barrels that didn't fit their brand and sent them upriver. Here's to hoping!
In the next review, I'll get into a little more of Aultmore's history, but for now I'm going to get right to the tasting notes. I'd entered this tasting hoping this experience would be better than my TBWC whisky from last week. Here's to hoping!
I tried these side by side. I'm reviewing the one on the left today. |
Distillery: Aultmore
Owner: Bacardi Inc.
Owner: Bacardi Inc.
Independent Bottler: That Boutique-y Whisky Company
Age: damfino
Maturation: yarp
Type: Single Malt
Region: Speyside (Banffshire)
Region: Speyside (Banffshire)
Alcohol by Volume: 56.0%
Limited Release: 226 bottles
(Thank you to Tetris for donating this sample to Diving for Pearls Laboratory!)
NEAT
The color is light gold. The nose starts with a wallop of pine sap, similar to the TWBC Allt-à-Bhainne. That's followed by caramel, bitter orange, and lots of ethyl. After some time, smaller notes of rosemary, savory herbs, brown sugar, and chlorine emerge. The palate is piney too, at first. Then comes vanilla, caramel, and tangy lemon. There's a little bit of spice and malt, much more cinnamon syrup. Lots of heat in the finish. There are the tangy lemons, cinnamon, and vanilla, along with some black pepper.
Feels like this could use some water.
WITH WATER (approx. 48%abv)
Somehow, the nose is hotter. Less pine, though. The caramel and chlorine are still around. In the background are some fresh oranges and a little bit of simple perfume. The palate starts floral (more flowers than perfume now) and very spirity. There's a slight sweetness along with vanilla and pepper. The finish is bitterer. Lots of heat, still. Then pepper, sugar, and pine.
Water didn't do much to open it up, unless more was required. It seemed very very young, even younger than the five year old Aultmore I'll review next. The palate was more enjoyable than the nose as its combo of vanilla/caramel/lemon/cinnamon made for acceptable drinking. And there was no fatal flaw as there was in the TBWC Allt-à-Bhainne. Though, while there are similarities between my notes and the official ones, I'm having a difficult time saying anything complimentary about this Aultmore. It's not terrible, but it seems like it was pulled from the oven before it was done baking. And if it isn't in fact very young whisky, then maybe it could have used a better cask. But I have no idea since TBWC discloses no information about their whiskies.
Once again, there aren't many (or any?) reviews of this whisky online. For what it's worth, the whiskybase folks have rated it the lowest of the Aultmore TBWC batches. If one bought a bottle and is struggling to get through it, perhaps blending it with a decent sherried malt may help it out. And perhaps could it inspire one not to buy a whisky based on its label next time?
Limited Release: 226 bottles
(Thank you to Tetris for donating this sample to Diving for Pearls Laboratory!)
NEAT
The color is light gold. The nose starts with a wallop of pine sap, similar to the TWBC Allt-à-Bhainne. That's followed by caramel, bitter orange, and lots of ethyl. After some time, smaller notes of rosemary, savory herbs, brown sugar, and chlorine emerge. The palate is piney too, at first. Then comes vanilla, caramel, and tangy lemon. There's a little bit of spice and malt, much more cinnamon syrup. Lots of heat in the finish. There are the tangy lemons, cinnamon, and vanilla, along with some black pepper.
Feels like this could use some water.
WITH WATER (approx. 48%abv)
Somehow, the nose is hotter. Less pine, though. The caramel and chlorine are still around. In the background are some fresh oranges and a little bit of simple perfume. The palate starts floral (more flowers than perfume now) and very spirity. There's a slight sweetness along with vanilla and pepper. The finish is bitterer. Lots of heat, still. Then pepper, sugar, and pine.
Water didn't do much to open it up, unless more was required. It seemed very very young, even younger than the five year old Aultmore I'll review next. The palate was more enjoyable than the nose as its combo of vanilla/caramel/lemon/cinnamon made for acceptable drinking. And there was no fatal flaw as there was in the TBWC Allt-à-Bhainne. Though, while there are similarities between my notes and the official ones, I'm having a difficult time saying anything complimentary about this Aultmore. It's not terrible, but it seems like it was pulled from the oven before it was done baking. And if it isn't in fact very young whisky, then maybe it could have used a better cask. But I have no idea since TBWC discloses no information about their whiskies.
Once again, there aren't many (or any?) reviews of this whisky online. For what it's worth, the whiskybase folks have rated it the lowest of the Aultmore TBWC batches. If one bought a bottle and is struggling to get through it, perhaps blending it with a decent sherried malt may help it out. And perhaps could it inspire one not to buy a whisky based on its label next time?
Availability - Master of Malt (though it's sold out)
Rating - 74