The price list has grown longer and wider this year. So though there are words above and below the spreadsheet, I know you're here for the spreadsheet.
As I write every year, here's some background on the data below:
I am using Wine Searcher's Average Wine Price system, selecting only US retailers. Their site has an explanation behind how they arrive at averages. To summarize, they do not include auctions; all prices are adjusted to 750mL bottles; they remove the highest and lowest 20% prices in order to correct for pricing errors or egregious retailer choices. Aside from the ability to scroll through pricing history, Wine Searcher's big draw for data purposes is their retailer count. For instance, if you search for Johnnie Walker Black Label they'll actually stop their listings at 500 retailers. Their system has over
I encourage you to check out my shared Google Doc at this link. It may be easer to follow, scroll through and filter(?) than it is here.
Three paragraphs about my methodology:
I'm using a similar methodology as last year. There are 179 whiskies listed in total. Thanks to my spreadsheet, I have data back to 2007 (the first year of the so-called whisky boom) for 116 of them. Last year I added a bunch of additional single malts. At that point Winesearcher only had data as far back as 2011, which just happened to be the most successful of the "boom" years. There are 39 of those malts in the list. This year, I've updated the list with 24 more malts. Winesearcher only has January data as far back as 2013. So I've added an additional column with all the 2013 prices. (Also, RIP Benromach 21, Benromach 25, Clynelish DE, Glengoyne 17, Strathisla 12 and Scapa 16. There are too few retailers selling those malts, so the average prices are no longer reliable. Expect the RIP list add another 12 more malts next year.)
Because directly comparing a 10-year price change percentage with a 6-year price change percentage with a 4-year price change percentage is crap math, I'm using the same metric as I did last year to measure the increases: Multiple of Inflation (or MOI). MOI takes the total price change and divides it by the US's inflation (CPI) rate over the related period of time (10, 6 or 4 years). For the whiskies that start with the Jan2007 data, the inflation was 17.1% (or $1 in Jan2007 was worth $1.171 in Jan2017). For the whiskies whose data starts with 2011, the inflation was 8% (or $1 in Jan2011 would be worth $1.08 in Jan2017). For the whiskies whose data starts with 2013, the inflation was 4.2% (or $1 in Jan2013 was worth $1.042 in Jan2017).
The color-coding is based on the MOI, as follows:
Dark blue = price actually decreased, thus a negative MOI
Light blue = price increased between 0 and the actual rate of inflation
Green = price increased between 1 and 2 times the rate of inflation
Light pink = price increased between 2 and 5 times the rate of inflation
Fire Truck Red = price increased between 5 and 10 times the rate of inflation
Black = price increased more than 10 times the rate of inflation
ANALYSIS
There are going to be fewer charts than last year, as I try to do my best to avoid comparing apples to Ledaigs. Let's take a quick look at the price increase between January 2016 and January 2017.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflated 1.5% in 2016. When finding the average of the 179 whiskies from the above spreadsheet, one finds the average single malt had a price increase of 4.35% in 2016. In 2015, whisky prices increased 8 times the rate of the CPI. In 2016, these single malts increased slightly less than 3 times the CPI. While prices increased slower, they still increased considerably faster than the country's consumer goods and services. On the other hand, that percentage increase is considerably less than the 14% increase in price/liter of Scotch whisky exports to the United States.
But as I've found in years past, whisky age categories don't see their prices change at the same rates, so there is no "average" whisky. So here's how each age statement group's prices went up in 2016.
Note: this is the only chart to use percentages |
Actually, just for kicks. Here's another chart of the age statement categories by whisky count:
Yeah, let that NAS count sink in for a moment. Then consider the fact that number does not include all of the NAS bottlings that have come out over the past three years. NAS will probably be the largest category in the spreadsheet within the next two years.
Anyway, back to rising whisky prices.
Let's take that Average Price Increase idea and see what has happened over the past 10 years, using the MOI metric.
What shocks me is how incredibly tidy these numbers turned out. As each category increases in age, its prices escalate at a greater rate.
Again this does not mean 8 to 10 year old whiskies barely went up in price over the past ten years. It means they went up in price at almost the same rate as the US consumer price index during the same time period. General price inflation was up more than 17% during the past 10 years, so the price of the average 8-10yo common single malt in the US has gone up somewhere between 18% and 20% during that time period.
As a whisky consumer (though barely a consumer at this point), I think it's reasonable for a popular single malt's price to go up slightly faster than inflation. There was a great increase in demand for single malts in the United States during over the past ten years. That's why I don't sweat the price increases in the green range in the spreadsheet. It's when single malts start doubling, tripling or quadrupling the rate of inflation that a certain nerd starts writing a post called "What Was the Scotch Whisky Boom?"
When it comes to 25+ year old single malts, the industry seems to have moved as a whole to create and expand an ultra-ultra-luxury whisky market. They're still searching for the ceiling.
Younger, cheaper single malts are going up in price, but at a gradual rate. The rise in teenage whisky prices seemed to have calmed down in 2016. But long-aged whisky has moved into another solar system, a place where a single malt twice as old can cost 20 to 30 times as much.
Remember, the influence of importers, distributors and retailers on these prices cannot be overstated. The price per liter (in GBP) of exported Scotch went up 2% in 2015, about 4 times US inflation, while these single malts' prices rose 4%, or 8 times inflation. In 2016, that price per liter (in GBP) went up nearly 9 times US inflation (before the pound dropped) in the first half 2016 alone, but our single malts' prices rose under 3 times inflation for the year. As I've referenced, inflation will cause price changes, as will swings in exchange rates.
The price still goes up in Scotch whisky's most lucrative market because American humans keep buying expensive booze. The best some of us can hope for in the near future is a plateau to form on the line graph. In the meantime, you don't have to buy that one whisky bottle over there, but the fact is, someone else will. Are you okay with that?
Michael it's great that you're keeping track of all this, and I think the yearly-updated database is very valuable!
ReplyDeleteAgain, my overall impression is that what we have is a rational market, where supply & demand work. Your price change-by-age-group craph is very telling. In particular, the exponential raise in price for old whiskies has to do with the long time it takes to re-supply them. The low/null increase in the 8-10yo range reflects the fact that the supply is almost caught up in that category. So - as I wrote last year - it seems to me that the producers came up with the super-luxury bling-bling BS *in response* to the increased demand leading to scarcity, rather than as a cartel conspiracy to fleece us. In 3-5 years, while the supply you presented in Part I (I believe) will fully catch up demand in the teen-age category, the loch will be upon us and we'll see the prices drop. Until then, the single malt fan who's paying attention can still navigate the market comfortably and find excellent bottles for $50-$100. Anecdotally I notice that, while the single malt prices are still high, the buy-now, FOMA craze has subsided a lot compared to its foamy top of 2013-2014. Or maybe it's just me...
Note: craph = chart + graph, *not* crap graph! Sorry for the typo...
DeleteAnd now even David Driscoll admits the prices are bound to come down.
DeleteI hope he doesn't tear his rotator cuff from patting himself on the back so much. He can't speak of a single bit of news without making it all about him. That narcissism reminds of some politician, but I can't remember his orange name.
Delete